<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: About Us</title> <atom:link href="http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/about-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com</link> <description>Focused organisation, content curation and sharing</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: That's A Wrap: January 21, 2011 - NewBizBlogger</title><link>http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/about-2/#comment-4</link> <dc:creator>That's A Wrap: January 21, 2011 - NewBizBlogger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:08:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/wp/?page_id=2#comment-4</guid> <description>[...] Ryah Albatros @ryahalbatros from Information Junkies Anonymous  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ryah Albatros @ryahalbatros from Information Junkies Anonymous  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: InfoJunkiesAnon</title><link>http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/about-2/#comment-3</link> <dc:creator>InfoJunkiesAnon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/wp/?page_id=2#comment-3</guid> <description>Is there a difference between information gathered as a record of a subject and information we consume daily, especially in this niche of making money blogging? I would consider your libraries not just an information for you personally, but as an historical record too.
Perhapas my definition of an information junkie needs refining - actually, I expect it will evolve with the site - but your collection of books hasn&#039;t stopped you producing Website In A Weekend. What I see (and I include myself in this) are people grabbing all the information they can because it promises to help them make money blogging, but few seem to actually reach that goal. No information product will give us the magic answer to making money unless we read it thoroughly and put it into practice.
Thansk for stopping by Dave, it&#039;s nice to see you!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a difference between information gathered as a record of a subject and information we consume daily, especially in this niche of making money blogging? I would consider your libraries not just an information for you personally, but as an historical record too.</p><p>Perhapas my definition of an information junkie needs refining &#8211; actually, I expect it will evolve with the site &#8211; but your collection of books hasn&#8217;t stopped you producing Website In A Weekend. What I see (and I include myself in this) are people grabbing all the information they can because it promises to help them make money blogging, but few seem to actually reach that goal. No information product will give us the magic answer to making money unless we read it thoroughly and put it into practice.</p><p>Thansk for stopping by Dave, it&#8217;s nice to see you!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryah Albatros</title><link>http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/about-2/#comment-108</link> <dc:creator>Ryah Albatros</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/wp/?page_id=2#comment-108</guid> <description>Is there a difference between information gathered as a record of a subject and information we consume daily, especially in this niche of making money blogging? I would consider your libraries not just an information for you personally, but as an historical record too. nnPerhapas my definition of an information junkie needs refining - actually, I expect it will evolve with the site - but your collection of books hasn&#039;t stopped you producing Website In A Weekend. What I see (and I include myself in this) are people grabbing all the information they can because it promises to help them make money blogging, but few seem to actually reach that goal. No information product will give us the magic answer to making money unless we read it thoroughly and put it into practice. nnThansk for stopping by Dave, it&#039;s nice to see you!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a difference between information gathered as a record of a subject and information we consume daily, especially in this niche of making money blogging? I would consider your libraries not just an information for you personally, but as an historical record too. nnPerhapas my definition of an information junkie needs refining &#8211; actually, I expect it will evolve with the site &#8211; but your collection of books hasn&#8217;t stopped you producing Website In A Weekend. What I see (and I include myself in this) are people grabbing all the information they can because it promises to help them make money blogging, but few seem to actually reach that goal. No information product will give us the magic answer to making money unless we read it thoroughly and put it into practice. nnThansk for stopping by Dave, it&#8217;s nice to see you!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Doolin</title><link>http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/about-2/#comment-2</link> <dc:creator>Dave Doolin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/wp/?page_id=2#comment-2</guid> <description>I&#039;ve always been this way.  I bet I have over 1000 books.  And I have a complete library of published papers on rock fracture mechanics spanning roughly 1900 to 1995.  Another complete library of papers on block mechanics in rock masses.  A huge number of papers on document similarity through about 2002.
I don&#039;t know why I do this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been this way.  I bet I have over 1000 books.  And I have a complete library of published papers on rock fracture mechanics spanning roughly 1900 to 1995.  Another complete library of papers on block mechanics in rock masses.  A huge number of papers on document similarity through about 2002.</p><p>I don&#8217;t know why I do this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Doolin</title><link>http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/about-2/#comment-107</link> <dc:creator>Dave Doolin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationjunkiesanonymous.com/wp/?page_id=2#comment-107</guid> <description>I&#039;ve always been this way.  I bet I have over 1000 books.  And I have a complete library of published papers on rock fracture mechanics spanning roughly 1900 to 1995.  Another complete library of papers on block mechanics in rock masses.  A huge number of papers on document similarity through about 2002.nnI don&#039;t know why I do this. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been this way.  I bet I have over 1000 books.  And I have a complete library of published papers on rock fracture mechanics spanning roughly 1900 to 1995.  Another complete library of papers on block mechanics in rock masses.  A huge number of papers on document similarity through about 2002.nnI don&#8217;t know why I do this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
